![]() |
Home | Archives | Topics | Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association | Login |
![]() |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Resource allocation
→ Search PubMed for related articles
→ More articles on Medical profession
→ More articles on Emergency medicine
→ Buy article — Buy issue
Human Resource Management
Introduction
—Methods
—Definition
—Questionnaire
—Study sample
—Ethics approval
—Data analyses
—Results
—Question 1: Perceived barriers to continuing medical education
—Question 2: Rotations with limited or inadequate CME
—Question 3: Further barriers to CME
—Discussion
—Barriers to CME
—Rotations with inadequate CME
—International medical graduates
—Limitations
—Conclusions
—Competing interests
—References
—Author details
To determine perceived barriers to continuing education for Australian hospital-based prevocational doctors, a cross sectional cohort survey was distributed to medical administrators for secondary redistribution to 2607 prevocational doctors from August 2003 to October 2004. Four hundred and seventy valid questionnaires (18.1%) were returned. Only seven per cent (33/470) did not identify any barriers to continuing education. Barriers identified the most were lack of time (85% [371/437]), clinical commitment (65% [284/437]), resistance from registrars (13% [57/437]) and resistance from consultant staff (10% [44/437]). Other barriers included workload issues (27% [27/98]), teaching program inadequacies (26% [25/98]), lack of protected time for education (17% [17/98]), motivational issues (11% [10/98]) and geographic remoteness (10% [10/98]). Australian graduates (87%) identified lack of time more frequently than international medical graduates (77%) (P = 0.036). Perceived barriers did not differ significantly between doctors of differing postgraduate years.
©Aust Health Rev 2008 www.aushealthreview.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0156-5788 ONLINE ISSN: 1449-8944