|
![]() |
|
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Primary health care
→ More articles on Chronic disease services
→ More articles on Health promotion and prevention
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
→ Click here for subscription options
Implementing chronic disease self-management in community settings: lessons from Australian demonstration projects
Introduction
—Methods
—Chronic disease self-management demonstration projects
—Evaluation approach
—Process evaluation
—Impact and outcome evaluation
—Models for facilitating chronic disease self-management
—Stanford chronic disease self-management course
—Generic self-management planning, training and support model
—Tailored self-management planning and support model
—Telephone coaching model
—Discussion
—Acknowledgements
—Competing interests
—References
—Author details
The evaluation of the Sharing Health Care Initiative addressed the translation of different models of chronic disease self-management into health and community service contexts in Australia. Across seven projects, four intervention models were adopted: (1) the Stanford Chronic Disease Self Management course; (2) generic disease management planning, training and support; (3) tailored disease management planning, training and support, and; (4) telephone coaching. Targeted recruitment through support groups and patient lists was most successful for reaching high-needs clients. Projects with well developed organisational structures and health system networks demonstrated more effective implementation. Engagement of GPs in recruitment and client support was limited. Future self-management programs will require flexible delivery methods in the primary health care setting, involving practice nurses or the equivalent. After 12 months there was little evidence of potential sustainability, although structures such as consumer resource centres and client support clubs were established in some locations. Only one project was able to use Medicare chronic disease-related items to integrate self-management support into routine general practice. Participants in all projects showed improvements in self-management practices, but those receiving Model 3, flexible and tailored support, and Model 4, telephone coaching, reported the greatest benefits.
Login or register to purchase access to the full article
|
|
| Home | Archives | Terms of use | Contact | Topics |
©Aust Health Rev 2007 www.aushealthreview.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0156-5788 ONLINE ISSN: 1449-8944