|
![]() |
|
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Quality
→ More articles on Health services research
→ More articles on Performance monitoring
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
→ Click here for subscription options
Introduction
—What is quality?
—Quality indicators
—Classifying quality indicators
—Developing ideal quality indicators
—Validity
—Reliability
—Sensitivity and specificity
—Limitations of quality indicators
—Quality indicator issues
—Conclusions
—Competing interests
—Acknowledgements
—References
—Author details
It is no longer sufficient for health care professionals to provide high quality health care, they must also be able to demonstrate that they are meeting and often exceeding quality targets. Quality indicators (QIs) provide a means of measuring and assessing quality, however there are advantages and disadvantages of indicator measurement. Further, the clinical perspective needs to be balanced against managerial control when developing valid, reliable, sensitive and specific QIs. While indicators do not represent a perfect measurement device, they may provide a useful tool for improving patient safety and meeting community expectations.
Login or register to purchase access to the full article
|
|
| Home | Archives | Terms of use | Contact | Topics |
©Aust Health Rev 2007 www.aushealthreview.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0156-5788 ONLINE ISSN: 1449-8944